Most Enterprise AI Is Already Obsolete
What leaders need to understand about AI 2.0, UX, and platform choice
Tripty Arya
February 14, 2026
C-Suite Leaders,
This marks the beginning of a new Strategy Saturday series focused on AI 2.0, a shift already underway, but not yet fully understood. Between 2018 till 2025 , organizations invested in what we might now call AI 1.0: narrowly defined use cases, rule-based NLP systems, intent-classification chatbots, predictive models buried behind dashboards. These systems separated natural language understanding from generation, and they relied heavily on humans to clean data, translate business intent into technical logic, and manage outcomes manually. This showcased incremental gains and the promise of machine learning , but it also created friction. AI lived behind interfaces, not within them.
But there came an inflection point in November 2022, when ChatGPT demonstrated something fundamentally different. By layering a conversational interface over foundation models, it didn’t just automate a response. It changed how people engage with systems entirely. Conversation became the interface. Dialogue became the workflow. And creation, reasoning, and iteration moved into a single, shared experience.
This was not about automating chat. It was about using chat as the UI for thinking, building, and collaborating.
What defines AI 2.0
AI 2.0 is not characterized by a single model or vendor. It is defined by a shift in interaction. Instead of point solutions optimized for one task, we are seeing the rise of multi-use platforms where a conversational interface is the common entry point across workflows, data, and tools.
In this model, users no longer navigate systems by menus, forms, or dashboards. They engage through intent. They ask, refine, explore, and correct in natural language. The system adapts to how humans think — rather than forcing humans to adapt to how software is structured.
This is why UX, and especially conversational UX, has moved from the margins to the center of AI strategy.
Conversational interface does not mean chatbot
Chatbot is an AI 1.0 concept and terminology. In the new era of AI 2.0, the platform interaction itself is conversational. Popular examples like Lovable or Cursor showcase this very tangible shift of conversation not being a thing to “automate” but an actual interface for creation.
Lovable demonstrates conversational UX as a creation engine. Users describe entire applications in plain language and the platform generates full-stack web applications, infrastructure, and deployment in response. The conversation itself is the mechanism by which intent becomes execution. This is not customer support. Chat is the build interface.
Cursor shows the same shift in software development. Embedded directly into the coding environment, Cursor allows developers to converse with their entire codebase asking where logic lives, how patterns repeat, or how systems should be refactored. The conversational interface becomes a way to explore, reason over, and act on complex data in real time. Again, this is not helpdesk automation. It is engagement with platforms and data through dialogue.
Together, these tools reveal the defining insight of AI 2.0: conversational interfaces are no longer a gimmick or a support channel. They are becoming the primary experience layer for engaging with platforms, logic, and data.
What this means for adoption and designing the technical stack
The recent JLL Global Real Estate Technology Survey underscores a broader enterprise reality: while a high percentage of organizations (roughly 90%) are piloting AI, only about 5% are meeting their goals across all initiatives. Experimentation is widespread, but scaling value remains elusive when AI isn’t integrated into everyday work in a way people trust and adopt and when interfaces don’t keep pace with how humans think and work.
This is where UX, and especially conversational UX, becomes a strategic imperative. When people can interact naturally with systems asking what they want, refining results, correcting misunderstandings, and exploring alternatives adoption accelerates. When they cannot, AI becomes something to work around, not with. What many organizations are discovering is that this shift is not purely additive. It requires leaders to become comfortable unraveling parts of their AI 1.0 stack. Architectures built for narrow, deterministic use cases and point solutions do not translate well to a world where conversation is the primary interface for engaging with platforms and data.
The pace of change in technology has also compressed the cost of hesitation. Tech debt no longer accumulates over five to ten years. It accrues in twelve to twenty-four months. Systems that cannot adapt to new models, new interaction patterns, and new workflows become constraints almost immediately. That is why, in AI 2.0, platform selection becomes a defining leadership decision. Organizations will need to select platforms designed for conversational engagement across multiple use cases not based on roadmap, but based on its flexibility to create through conversation. Without a shared conversational platform, AI efforts fragment, learning never compounds, and teams are forced to relearn how to work every time the stack changes.
In this new era, flexibility is not a luxury. It is the only sustainable defense against rapid obsolescence.
Preparing for the conversational AI era
This is not a training problem in the old sense. It’s not about learning a UI or mastering a tool. The skills organizations need now are problem framing, iterative collaboration, and conversational fluency with systems that think and respond in natural language.
Here’s what leaders should be doing to prepare their people and their organizations:
[Train for thinking, not scripting]
People need to learn how to conceptualize problems in conversational terms — how to break down goals, articulate intent clearly, and engage in iterative refinement with AI. This is not about memorizing prompts. It’s about learning to interact with context, ambiguity, and evolving output.
[Build collaborative workflows]
Conversational AI isn’t a solo tool , it’s a shared interface that connects knowledge workers, data, and platforms. Organizations should design workflows that incorporate conversational agents as collaborators, not replacements — fostering teamwork between humans and AI.
[Embrace model-agnostic experience design]
Focus on the interaction layer like how the system asks questions, explains uncertainty, and invites correction and not just on the underlying models. This creates resilience: as models evolve, the conversational experience remains familiar and usable.
[Align leaders and practitioners on evaluation metrics]
Measure success not by model accuracy alone, but by trust, adoption, time-to-insight, and collaboration outcomes. These human-centered metrics are leading indicators of long-term value.
[Invest in UX and design literacy across the organization]
Conversational UX is a design discipline. It belongs in governance conversations alongside security, compliance, and data strategy. Leaders should empower UX professionals to shape not only interfaces, but how people learn, adapt, and co-create with AI.
Looking Ahead
AI is no longer a set of isolated automation tools. We have entered the era of AI as a conversational experience platform where the interface isn’t a button or a dashboard, but dialogue itself. This era places new demands on organizational culture, workflows, and people’s thinking.
The organizations that succeed will be those that embrace this shift — not by chasing the newest model, but by redesigning how work gets done in conversational terms. In doing so, they won’t just adopt AI. They will transform how value is created, shared, and amplified across their enterprise.
Because in this new era, strength won’t come from intelligence alone. It will come from our ability to engage with it meaningfully, thoughtfully, and collaboratively.
Additional Resources:
To support this AI 2.0 series, we’ve created an AI Guide for Business Leaders that outlines the key differences between AI 1.0 and AI 2.0, including how interaction models, platforms, and organizational expectations have evolved. The guide is designed as a practical reference for leaders looking to align strategy, technology, and operating models as AI becomes more conversational and platform-driven.
About This Email Series
This email is part of an ongoing Strategy Saturday series written for C-suite leaders and focused on the strategic shifts required to lead effectively in an AI-driven world. The insights and perspectives shared are intended to support strategic reflection and informed decision-making, rather than prescribe specific actions.
-> Next Month: AI has a budget problem
